Monday, June 27, 2005

6/27/05 - 7/3/05

The direction that society is headed reeks of the Protocols of Zion. There is no doubt in my mind that the “Protocols” is the blueprint which the global elite are working off of to usher in their long awaited new world order.

The US Supreme Court
And The Protocols Of Zion

Comment By Anonymous

Dear Mr. Rense,

I just turned on my computer and at the top of the news I read that the Supreme Court ruled that putting framed copies of the Ten Commandments in county courthouses violated church-state separation!

It reminded me of Protocol 14:


2. At the same time we shall not omit to emphasize the historical mistakes of the GOY governments which have tormented humanity for so many centuries by their lack of understanding of everything that constitutes the true good of humanity in their chase after fantastic schemes of social blessings, and have never noticed that these schemes kept on producing a worse and never a better state of the universal relations which are the basis of human life ...

3. The whole force of our principles and methods will lie in the fact that we shall present them and expound them as a splendid contrast to the dead and decomposed old order of things in social life.


5. IN COUNTRIES KNOWN AS PROGRESSIVE AND ENLIGHTENED WE HAVE CREATED A SENSELESS, FILTHY, ABOMINABLE LITERATURE. For some time after our entrance to power we shall continue to encourage its existence in order to provide a telling relief by contrast to the speeches, party program, which will be distributed from exalted quarters of ours .... Our wise men, trained to become leaders of the GOYIM, will compose speeches, projects, memoirs, articles, which will be used by us to influence the minds of the GOYIM, directing them towards such understanding and forms of knowledge as have been determined by us.

Protocols Of Zion - Origin
Of The Bush 'Patriot Act'

Comment From David Barenboim

Hi Jeff,

I read with interest all of your Protocols articles. You may want to add this story:

Your readers should also know that the origin of our 'Patriot Act' is clearly IMHO from Protocol No. 18.

Yours, David

Protocols No. 18

1. When it becomes necessary for us to strengthen the strict measures of secret defense (the most fatal poison for the prestige of authority) we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents finding expression through the co-operation of good speakers. Round these speakers will assemble all who are sympathetic to his utterances. This will give us the pretext for domiciliary prerequisitions and surveillance on the part of our servants from among the number of the GOYIM police

UFO sightings are no longer limited to crazy nut jobs who watch too much science fiction. When these things are spotted during a very public political campaign, you have to wonder. Is it getting close to disclosure time?

Mexican Party Raises Idea UFOs Spotted at Campaign
By John Rice Associated Press Writer
MEXICO CITY (AP) - Gubernatorial candidate Yeidckol Polevnsky may be trailing in the polls, but campaign aides suggested Thursday that she's gaining energy from an unlikely source: objects some describe as UFOs.
Cameramen working for Polevnsky's leftist Democratic Revolution Party appeared on Mexico's most-watched morning television news program to show images of rod-like objects darting in front of the candidate several times as she spoke at a rally in the State of Mexico.
"We don't know if this is a paranormal phenomenon," said campaign adviser Raul Correa.
But he said that both he and Polevnsky agreed "it could be a good vibration for us and I hope it favors us for the July 3 election" for Mexico's most populous state.
"Insects?" asked Televisa anchorman Carlos Loret de Mola, with a burst of laughter.
"It's energy, it seems," Correa responded.
Cameramen Jose Luis Martinez and Israel Enriquez said the objects resembled "Roswell rods," whose investigation is promoted by UFO enthusiasts and researchers in the United States.
Some have suggested the mysterious objects could be from space. Others say they seem to be a previously unidentified terrestrial life form. Skeptics say they are probably just a visual effect caused in cameras under some circumstances by fast-moving insects.
They were identified in 1994 by U.S. cameraman Jose Escamilla, who was working at Roswell, New Mexico, famous as a site of alleged UFO sightings.
The campaign aides said they discovered the images when workers at the Federal Electoral Institute, which allocates television airtime for Mexican political parties, noted what appeared to be flaws in their videotape.
One of the institute workers said they resembled the "rods" featured on a television program by Jaime Maussan, who specializes in shows on UFOs and paranormal phenomena.
Correa, whose candidate is running third in most polls, said he decided that "this should be made known."
Appearing on the news program, Maussan called the rods "a fascinating phenomenon," but noted no physical evidence, such as the body, of a rod has been found.
The campaign of Polevnsky, formerly head of a national business chamber, has been troubled from the start.
After weeks of newspaper speculation that she was using a false name, she confirmed in March that she had changed her original name after being abused as a child. Critics have continued to question whether the name change - and thus her candidate registration - was legal.

The George Orwell novel is required reading at most high school English courses. Watching world events unfold brings back memories of that same creepy story that we all read once upon a time. Who would’ve thought that we would live to see the day where it became reality?

The Return Of '1984'
By H.D.S. Greenway
The Boston Globe

If you take something to read at the beach this summer make sure it is not one of George Orwell's books. The comparison with current events will ruin your day.

In what was then the futuristic, nightmare world of "1984," written in 1949, Orwell introduced the concepts of "newspeak," "doublethink," and "the mutability of the past," all concepts that seem to be alive and well in 2005, half a century after Orwell's death. In the ever-changing rationale of why we went to war in Iraq, we can imagine ourselves working in Orwell's "Ministry of Truth," in which "reality control" is used to ensure that "the lie passed into history and became the truth."

And what about the Bush administration's insistence that all is going well in Iraq? In the Ministry of Truth, statistics are adjustable to suit politics -- "merely the substitution of one piece of nonsense for another," Orwell wrote. "Most of the material that you were dealing with had no connection to anything in the real world, not even the kind of connection that is contained in a direct lie. Statistics were just as much a fantasy in their original version as in the rectified version." Welcome to the Iraq war, Mr. Orwell.

What of Donald Rumsfeld's newspeak, or was it doublethink, saying that "no detention facility in the history of warfare has been more transparent" than Guantanamo? We have the FBI's word for it that prisoners were chained hand and foot in a fetal position to the floor, left for 18 to 24 hours with no food and no water, left to defecate and urinate on themselves.

The deaths by torture in Abu Ghraib and Afghanistan sound very much like what happens in Orwell's fictional torture chamber: Room 101.

He might as well have been writing about the Bush administration's redefinition of torture when he wrote about using "logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it."

In Orwell's profoundly pessimistic view: "Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind."

There is something profoundly Orwellian, too, about the administration's attempts to impose thought control on public broadcasting. The sometimes secret machinations to place impositions on editorial freedom, the efforts to see which people interviewed by Bill Moyers might be considered anti-Bush or anti-Defense Department or insufficiently conservative, were just the kind of efforts to squash intellectual opposition to state power that Orwell wrote about.

I was amused to see even a conservative Republican senator, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, was branded as a "liberal" because he dared criticize the Pentagon -- a "thought criminal" in Orwell's parlance.

The drum beat by some conservatives to bring down an independent judiciary is another case in point. We learned from the case of unfortunate, blind, and brain-dead Terri Schiavo that it isn't activist judges who are the enemy. It is judges who are not active in the correct causes.

It is the intended persecution of Michael Schiavo, who defended his wife's right to die, however, that has for me the most sinister echoes of Orwell. Florida Governor Jeb Bush, according to news reports, will have the case reopened after 15 years to investigate how long it took Schiavo to dial 911. Thus will Michael Schiavo feel the displeasure of the state for challenging the conservative orthodoxy.

In the effort to squash dissent, as evidenced by moves to change the Sentate's filibuster rules, there seems to be the belief among the majority that they will always stay in the majority, that they will never lose the Senate, and, therefore, never themselves need to filibuster.

Orwell had something to say about this too. "Power worship blurs political judgment," he wrote in an essay, "because it leads, almost unavoidably, to the belief that present trends will continue. Whoever is winning at the moment will always seem to be invincible."

There are any number of Guantanamo defenders who could fit neatly into George Orwell's essay when he wrote: "In our time, political speech and writing is largely the defense of the indefensible."

Bush addressed the nation last night in a nationally televised speech. He continuously justified the military actions in Iraq by linking it to the terror attacks on 9/11/01.
Hello????? Didn’t you say that Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden were responsible for the attacks? What do they have to do with Iraq? This is like saying we will invade China for what Japan did at Pearl Harbor. Of course, the insulated, ignorant people in the U.S.A. who cant tell the difference between Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Iraq will clump all of these together as ‘dem crazy middle eastern terrorists’ and swallow up these lies fed to the public by the propaganda machine and wave their miniature flags. However, not all Americans are buying into this. This issue further polarizes the country into so called “liberals” and “conservatives”, blue states, red states. Are these really UNITED States?

Bush slammed for Iraq link to 9/11
Wednesday, June 29, 2005; Posted: 9:36 a.m. EDT (13:36 GMT)
(CNN) -- Critics of the U.S. war in Iraq have condemned President George W. Bush for attempting to link the insurgency there with the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington.
In a televised address marking a year since the U.S. handover of sovereignty in Iraq, Bush urged Americans not to "forget the lessons of September 11."
Speaking before a military audience at Fort Bragg, North Carolina Tuesday, the president set out his strategy for victory against the insurgency, including foreign groups such as that led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
He also pledged that American troops would stay in Iraq until their job was done and that the U.S. would not "yield the future of the Middle East" to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda terror network.
In a bid to shore up flagging domestic support for the war, Bush said the war against terror had "reached our shores" on September 11 and that sacrifices in Iraq were "vital to the future security of our country."
But Democrats accused the president of reviving a questionable link between Iraq and 9/11.
"I think the American people are a lot smarter than that," Delaware Sen. Joseph Biden said. "They've figured this out."
And in Britain, Lynne Jones, a lawmaker in Prime Minister Tony Blair's ruling Labour Party, said any attempt to suggest that Iraq was a response to the September 11 attacks was "absolute nonsense."
"There is absolutely no connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda," she said.
"What they have ensured, in invading Iraq, is they have actually promoted al Qaeda's involvement in other countries, including Iraq."
British MP George Galloway, who was expelled from Labour over his criticism of the war, said, "The truth is, as everyone can see, that Zarqawi and the other extremist formations that have sprouted in Iraq are the result of the invasion, not the reason for it.
"The swamp of hatred against the West has been vastly deepened by the actions of those two world leaders, Bush and Blair."
Australian opposition politicians said the speech reinforced fears that the conflict would drag on indefinitely.
"Iraq has been a conflict without timelines, without an exit strategy and indeed without a mission statement from day one," Labor Party spokesman Tom Cameron said.
"Australia needs to refocus on the region and the war on terror instead of getting bogged down in the bloody quagmire of Iraq's insurgency."
David Gergen, a political analyst who has worked in both Democratic and Republican administrations, said the speech was an attempt to "try to stop the slide" in public support.
"What he's playing for is time, so that there's not enormous pressure put on him to withdraw," Gergen told CNN.
Gergen pointed out that Bush never used the term "insurgent," referring to them instead as "terrorists."
"(September 11) has been all along his trump card," Gergen said. "He played it in the campaign; he's playing it again now."
Support for Bush's speech came from the governments of staunch U.S. allies Britain and Australia, who praised the president's pledge to keep forces in Iraq until the fight was won.
"It was a very good speech that highlighted the need to fight for freedom and democracy and the determination of the United States and our other coalition partners to win that fight," said Australia's acting prime minister, John Anderson, who was standing in while John Howard was on vacation. (Full story)
In Britain, which sent the second-largest contingent of troops to Iraq, Blair told the House of Commons Wednesday: "I was glad that we took the action we did."

It looks like the false propaganda is working. Pretty slick if you ask me. Dan Brown’s story is fiction but sprinkled with history. By the time people are finished with the book, they consider the fiction part as fact. People end up seriously considering the idea of Jesus having had a child with Mary Magdalene. Too bad people don’t read their Bibles like they read Dan Brown.

Canadian readers believe Da Vinci Code
Paul Gessell
The Ottawa Citizen
The book has been condemned by Christian church officials, delighted conspiracy theorists and spawned a global pop culture phenomenon, writes Paul Gessell.
Almost two million Canadians who read the mega-selling book, The Da Vinci Code, ended the novel convinced that Jesus Christ fathered a line of descendants on Earth, a new survey suggests.
The coast-to-coast survey for the National Geographic Channel conducted by Decima Research found that, among 1,005 adults surveyed June 9-12, 16 per cent had read the book in the past two years.
Among those readers, 32 per cent believed the story that "a holy bloodline exists and that this secret has been protected through the ages by a dedicated society," the television channel announced yesterday.
Assuming the survey results truly indicate public opinion in a country of 32.8 million people, about 5.2 million Canadians would have read the book and about 1.7 million would believe it to be true. Based on the survey sample size, results can be considered accurate within 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
The survey was conducted to coincide with the 15-hour broadcast Sunday on the National Geographic Channel of Da Vinci Code Sunday. Programming includes three back-to-back documentaries about the book by author Dan Brown. The three documentaries are, in total, five hours long and will be broadcast repeatedly on the digital channel from 1 p.m. until 4 a.m. Monday.
The Da Vinci Code was published in 2003 and has since sold more than 25 million copies in 44 languages. The novel suggests that Jesus and Mary Magdalene produced descendants. According to the plot, Jesus' heirs were able to maintain their secrecy over the centuries because of an international conspiracy; clues to unravelling all these mysteries can be found in various books, architecture and artworks, including paintings by Italian Renaissance master, Leonardo Da Vinci.
The book has been condemned by some church officials, delighted conspiracy theorists, spawned a pop culture phenomenon and is about to be made into a Hollywood film.
Trailers for the film are already being screened in theatres alongside the latest Star Wars film, although not one scene has yet been shot. Britain's Westminster Abbey has refused to allow director Ron Howard to shoot scenes from the film there because the church believes the book to be "theologically unsound."
A. Trevor Hodge, a retired classics professor at Carleton University, has described The Da Vinci Code as "a bad book." However, Mr. Hodge said he is not surprised by the results of the National Geographic Channel survey indicating legions of Canadians believe the storyline to be true.
"There are a lot of people who will want to believe it," Mr. Hodge said. "They believe in conspiracy theories."
Conspiracy theories are, indeed, popular. Remember the dying days of the Brian Mulroney government, when public opinion polls showed fewer people supported the Conservatives than believed Elvis was alive and hidden away somewhere? How many continue to believe U.S. president, John Kennedy, was assassinated by the F.B.I.? And what about all those conspiracies to hide alien spaceship landings?
Mr. Hodge said the book is "dangerous." It's officially a novel -- and that means a fictional story -- yet it begins by stating that it is "factual."
Mr. Brown addresses these points on his website.
"The Da Vinci Code is a novel and therefore a work of fiction," he writes. "If you read the 'fact' page you will see it clearly states that the documents, rituals, organization, artwork and architecture in the novel all exist. The 'fact' page makes no statement whatsoever about any of the ancient theories discussed by fictional characters. Interpreting those ideas is left to the reader."
The idea of a sexual relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene is not new. Richard Wagner alludes to it in his opera Parsifal. Remember the broadway play, and later movie, Jesus Christ, Superstar? Sexual tension gripped the stage.
The idea of Jesus having descendants was popular for centuries in France, where some kings claimed Mary Magdalene was their ancestor. The late Diana, Princess of Wales, was even related to this family of supposedly holy rulers known as the Merovingian line of European royalty. That means Prince William, the future king of Canada, really could claim one day to rule by divine right
© The Ottawa Citizen 2005

First there was gold, then there were coins, then paper money, then credit cards. What’s next? Could it be fingerprints? Retina scans? Implantable microchips? Is the mark of the beast right around the corner?

Fingerprint may supplant credit card in biometric world
WASHINGTON (AFP) - The touch of a finger may replace the swipe of a credit card in a new payments systems that backers say is growing rapidly in the United States and has potential around the world.
Some retailers and consumers are giving rave reviews for the new system, in which customers use a finger scan to authorize payments from bank accounts.
"Every day we install new merchants -- grocery stores, car washes, chiropractors," said Tim Robinson, president of BioPay, which has some two million US customers enrolled and claims to be the largest company offering biometric payments.
For customers, Robinson said, "there's a cool factor" and for merchants, "it's cheap" because the system generally avoids credit card fees by drawing payments directly from bank accounts."
Rival Pay By Touch, based in San Francisco, has signed up major retailers including the Piggly Wiggly grocery chain and is in talks with "the top 100" US retailers and Britain's Co-op retail group, said marketing director Shannon Riordan.
"The more pilot programs we have, the more people are calling us," Riordan said.
"This is being driven by convenience. You don't have to dig for a wallet or a purse. The other big advantage is security, since everyone has a unique fingerprint and no one sees your (credit card) number."
Analysts say US consumers are largely receptive to the system, which requires customers to register with a fingerprint scan and then link a bank account or credit card to a merchant account.
"Our goal is to provide the convenience of a secure, wallet-less world where a person can go out for a walk to buy a coffee or an ice cream without having to carry a heavy wallet or purse," Robinson said.
"We also believe that retailers pay too much in credit and debit card fees and BioPay solves that problem."
Robinson said he expects to expand internationally, but noted that there are obstacles including certain European privacy laws that prevent firms from storing certain customer data.
BioPay and Pay By Touch are both privately held and do not release financial data. They are currently in litigation over patents for technology.
Kush Wadhwa of the International Biometric Group, a market research firm, said his firm projects sales of 68 million dollars for biometric point-of-sale equipment in 2005 growing to 243 million by 2008. The majority of this is in the United States.
"The public is quite receptive as along as there is a clear and compelling value," Wadhwa said.
The consumer and merchant benefit from convenience and speed as well as greater protection against fraud, the analyst said.
"As long it does not detract from their experience and is fast, I think consumers are more than receptive," he said, while noting that the system may not be as successful in some cultures, such as Japan, where there is a "stigma" attached to fingerprinting.
The use of fingerprints as an identifier is part of a growing field of field of biometrics technology, which can also use iris scans, voiceprints, facial recognition or other unique identifiers.
Already in use for security and law enforcement, the technology is now gaining acceptance for financial transactions such as check cashing or to replace other payment methods.
While some see privacy concerns arising from new databases, biometrics backers say fingerprints themselves are not stored, but instead a numerical algorithm computer from a series of unique indicators.
"We take 40 data points unique to your finger, and convert them to an algorithm, that is encrypted," said Riordan. "This cannot be reverse engineered into a fingerprint. If someone hacked into the database (the fingerprints) would be gobbledygook."
Tovah LaDier, managing director of the International Biometric Industry Association, said the system offers more security than existing payments, adding that "I think concerns about identity theft have precipitated more interest in biometrics."
Still, some analysts are lukewarm on the use of fingerprints and say customers may opt for other technologies to speed up transactions, including "contactless" credit cards.
"Biometrics is too large a leap for most consumers," said analyst Erik Michielsen at ABI research. "There has to be an interim step," such as using biometrics as a secondary identifier.
Avivah Litan, research director at high-tech market research firm Gartner, is even more skeptical.
"Overall consumers don't want to deal with any of this, they want to get in and out of the store," she said.
"It's a technology looking for a solution. We don't need it."
Copyright © 2005 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved.

Tom Cruise has been in the news a lot these days. First for his alleged relationship with Katie Holmes, his public promotion of Scientology, his run in with Matt Lauer on national TV debating psychiatric treatment, and now his new movie “The War of the Worlds”. I believe he is a tool used by the NWO, whether he knows it or not, for cultural conditioning. It’s all about the conditioning of the collective mindset of the masses to accept and embrace the new age movement and prepare for a real UFO disclosure of some sort.

Tom Cruise: We're not alone
Wednesday, June 29, 2005; Posted: 10:55 a.m. EDT (14:55 GMT)
BERLIN, Germany (Reuters) -- Hollywood actor Tom Cruise not only battles creatures from outer space in his latest film "War of the Worlds", he also believes aliens exist, he told a German newspaper on Wednesday.
Asked in an interview with the tabloid daily Bild if he believed in aliens, Cruise said: "Yes, of course. Are you really so arrogant as to believe we are alone in this universe?
"Millions of stars, and we're supposed to be the only living creatures? No, there are many things out there, we just don't know," Cruise, 42, said in the interview published in German.
Cruise is a follower of the Scientology church founded by science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard, and his recent willingness to discuss the faith has raised eyebrows in the media.
Most controversially, Cruise criticized actress Brooke Shields for revealing she had taken antidepressants. An official Scientology Web site argues that people should live drug-free.
Cruise also dismissed psychiatry as a "pseudo science", invoking the ire of the American Psychiatric Association that called the remarks "irresponsible".
But many scientologists feel they are unfairly criticized, arguing that although many believe in the concept of aliens, it is not such an unreasonable proposition, and that the side effects of some medication are not fully understood.
Cruise's new film "War of the Worlds" is based on British writer H.G. Wells' 1898 story of the invasion of Earth by Martians.

Remember when the U.S. used to pride itself on being a country that upheld religious values? It’s ironic that there are literally tons of Masonic/Babylonian symbols plastered all over courthouses and government buildings across the country that are taken for granted while anything Biblical needs to be barred from these same edifices for reason of separating church and state. According to that reasoning, shouldn’t all of the satanic symbols, statuettes, engravings be barred from these buildings as well? It appears the clandestine deception stage is over. They are enforcing the removal of anything that represents the true God in front of our faces. It doesn’t matter to them since no one really notices anyways.

Supreme Court bars Ten Commandments at courthouses
Monday, June 27, 2005; Posted: 10:55 a.m. EDT (14:55 GMT)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a narrowly drawn ruling, the Supreme Court struck down Ten Commandments displays in courthouses Monday, holding that two exhibits in Kentucky crossed the line between separation of church and state because they promoted a religious message.
The 5-4 decision, first of two seeking to mediate the conflict over religion's place in public life, took a case-by-case approach to this vexing issue. In the decision, the court declined to prohibit all displays in court buildings or on government property.
The justices left themselves legal wiggle room on this issue, however, saying that some displays -- like their own courtroom frieze -- would be permissible if they're portrayed neutrally in order to honor the nation's legal history.
But framed copies in two Kentucky courthouses went too far in endorsing religion, the court held.
"The touchstone for our analysis is the principle that the First Amendment mandates government neutrality between religion and religion, and between religion and nonreligion," Justice David H. Souter wrote for the majority.
"When the government acts with the ostensible and predominant purpose of advancing religion, it violates that central Establishment clause value of official religious neutrality," he said.
Souter was joined in his opinion by other members of the liberal bloc -- Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer, as well as Reagan appointee Sandra Day O'Connor, who provided the swing vote.
In a dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia argued that Ten Commandments displays are a legitimate tribute to the nation's religious and legal history.
Government officials may have had a religious purpose when they originally posted the Ten Commandments display by itself in 1999. But their efforts to dilute the religious message since then by hanging other historical documents in the courthouses made it constitutionally adequate, Scalia said.
He was joined in his opinion by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, as well as Justice Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.
"In the court's view , the impermissible motive was apparent from the initial displays of the Ten Commandments all by themselves: When that occurs: the Court says, a religious object is unmistakable," he wrote. "Surely that cannot be."
"The Commandments have a proper place in our civil history," Scalia wrote.
The case was one of two heard by the Supreme Court in March involving Ten Commandments displays in Kentucky and Texas. That case asks whether the Ten Commandments may be displayed on the grounds outside the state capitol.
The cases marked the first time since 1980 the high court tackled the emotional issue, in a courtroom boasting a wall carving of Moses holding the sacred tablets.
A broader ruling than the one rendered Monday could have determined the allowable role of religion in a wide range of public contexts, from the use of religious music in a school concert to students' recitation of "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. It is a question that has sharply divided the lower courts in recent years.
But in their ruling Monday, justices chose to stick with a cautious case-by-case approach.
Two Kentucky counties originally hung the copies of the Ten Commandments in their courthouses. After the ACLU filed suit, the counties modified their displays to add other documents demonstrating "America's Christian heritage," including the national motto of "In God We Trust" and a version of the Congressional Record declaring 1983 the "Year of the Bible."

The Fox media conglomerate which is owned and run by the freemasonic/Zionist forces that run everything else is promoting the implanted microchip. Should this be any surprise? Make no mistake, it is not for your benefit which is what they would like the public to believe by brainwashing with their propaganda. The only people that benefit from the microchip are the ones that want to control you. They want more power. The ‘greater good’ is according to their viewpoint not yours and mine.

Fox champions Verichip - says its "for the greater good"
Get your vomit bags at the ready
Technology Advances Often Must Be Nurtured
Fox News | June 25 2005
Despite what our memories may tell us in hindsight, technology advances usually don’t come as quickly and easily as we would like or progress as smoothly as they might in a perfect world.
There are almost always speed bumps in the road as technology moves from the lab to everyday use. One such emerging technology that has been in the news lately precisely because of some development and acceptance hiccups is RFID, a promising wireless technology that has innumerable potential uses.
Before we kill this technology with hyperbolic cries of privacy intrusions and the potential for Big Brother implementations, we need to give this technology time to develop.
RFID, which stands for Radio Frequency Identification, has been around in a primitive form in the EZ pass toll card found on growing numbers of automobile windshields. In this use, an electronic reader at the tollbooth “reads” a smart card containing a microchip as the car zips through the tollbooth. The reader “collects” the toll, which the driver has pre-paid by credit card or check, and the car passes through the tollbooth without stopping -- often without even slowing down very much.
Another common application is Exxon Mobil’s Speed Pass which allows users to fill up their car by simply waving a key chain tag in front of the gas pump.
RFID has been in the news recently because the State Department wants to use it in new passports. Under State Department plans, future American passports would include a microchip that contains information about the traveler. This would include all the traditional information found in passports, such as the bearer’s photo, passport number, date of birth, etc. By passing the passport over a reader, Customs and Immigration officials could access all this information which would then be displayed on a monitor.
At some point in the future, by requiring other nations to use this technology in their own passports, American security officials at border checkpoints, seaports and airports could more easily identify potential terrorists or others who should not be allowed to enter the country.
But the technology has come under fire recently because some people think it will be used as a way for the government to track people surreptitiously. These detractors envision privacy violations and other intrusions by government officials. As it turns out, the State Department has temporarily backed off plans to use RFID technology in passports anytime soon. The reasons are primarily centered on concerns that would-be criminals or terrorists could use hand-held readers to identify Americans in a crowd in a foreign country. Thus, under this scenario, an anti-terrorist weapon could become a tool of terrorists if the technology is in the hands of the wrong people.
All this, of course, has given critics of further deployment of RFID technology much to talk about. But before we throw the baby out with the bath water, we need to let this technology develop and see where it will lead us and see what additional real life applications there are for it. There are many and they are limited only by our imagination.
For example, this wireless technology lets merchants track inventory through the supply chain. Wal-Mart is already asking some of its vendors to use it on shipping pallets; other companies are experimenting with it as well. Someday all groceries and other products in a supermarket could be tracked using this wireless technology, increasing efficiency and productivity all along the way from manufacturer to warehouse to store to customer.
But ease and convenience are not the only benefits that could flow from dramatically expanded use of RFID technology. Besides making our lives more convenient, it could also protect lives by tracking and inventorying prescription drugs to help ensure safety. How could we say “No” to that?
While critics often deride RFID as a threat to privacy, there are a few consumer-focused RFID products on the market now that not only enhance a users’ privacy and but also serve the greater good. One such product is the VeriChip, an FDA approved RFID medical device that can quickly and efficiently provide caregivers access to a patient’s important medical information – ideal for medical emergency situations or when patients are incoherent or unconscious.
Even though it saves lives, Applied Digital, the company that produces the VeriChip, recognizes that the mere threat to privacy casts a shadow over their product and has taken steps to protect their consumers. These include the implementation of stringent security protocols, the appointment of a Chief Privacy Officer, and the adoption of a comprehensive privacy policy.
As pragmatic research and development on this new wireless technology plays out, we should keep in mind that the perfect solution to how any new technology should be implemented is seldom immediately known. In fact, history has shown that new technology often causes initial backlashes. But if scientists, developers and individual consumers who will be using the technology work together to determine the right best practices for its ultimate use, untold and unknown benefits and improvements will be found.

An interesting commentary on the different aspects of the conspiracy and how the dots connect between these three. Generally people are aware of these as isolated issues that have nothing to do with each other. When you take a step back and see the big picture, you are able to see how they are related. The writer of this article seems to get it.

China/Unocal - Israel Attack
On Iran - Pandemic Disaster

By Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.

First, Unocal...

The US has a little known entity that can reject the Chinese interest and intent regarding Unocal on national security/interest grounds. Remember that the beneficiary of the current Unocal deal is Chevron (NWO).

What you need to think about first is whether China wants the NWO to have this entity reject the overture.

If you think about it for a moment, China WANTS the US to reject it. Why? BY rejecting it the NWO affords China totally validity in doing what it wants to do: reject future NWO enmeshment via purchase of Chinese enterprise! China will broaden the doctrine and of course will not object to the US broadening it as well. What is the national security interest is within the pale of definition by the respective country. What is important to China is for the US to set up is the principle, which it will do openly now in rejecting China's interest in outbidding Chevron.

What if the deal is allowed to go through? China doesn't mind. Then it will resort to the contention that the US had the discretion to reject it or not. That it did not reject it does not limit China from applying it on a more stringent standard for its own interests.

Conclusion: China has everything to gain and nothing to lose in pursuing Unocal. It is again a brilliant Chinese maneuver. What it does is bring up the issue that the US can if it wants reject it. Thus, China cannot be faulted from applying the same standard as it deems best for the interests of its own country.

Now, look at the Iranian elections...

Did the NWO want the extremist candidate to win or lose?

It wanted Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to win to open the portal for Israel to attack Iran.

Look at our analysis the other day...

Start -

TEHRAN -- Moderate conservative presidential candidate Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjanihas promised to hand ordinary Iranians billions of dollars instockoptions and benefits in a last ditch bid to win their votes awayfromhardliner Mahmood Ahmadinejad. Rafsanjani, facing a run-off against the far right-winger on Friday, said he would give "every Iranian family 100 million rials (around 11,000 dollars) in shares of state companies to be privatised." Official figures show there are 14 million families in Iran, meaning the offer represents 155 billion dollars. Rafsanjani said in a campaign broadcast that the shares would have to be reimbursed over 10 years. He also said that every month the unemployed will receive between 800,000 and 1.5million rials (90-165 dollars), while women heads of households would be given 700,000 rials (80 dollars). Rafsanjani also pledged to "prioritise the poorer classes".

Comment: When he says state companies to be privatized THERE IS ONLYONE BENEFICIARY: THE NWO. Thus, Iran's religious clerics will now do everything to make sure that he does not win.


The result was a landslide victory for Ahmadinejad.

An official at the Guardian Council, which must approve the electionresults, said that out of 24.8 million voted counted, Ahmadinejad hadwon 61.7 percent of ballots cast, defying pre-poll predictions of atight race.The official said turnout was 26 million, or 56 percent, down on the 63 percent of Iran's 46.7 million eligible voters who cast ballots in an inconclusive first round on June 17."It's over, we accept that we've lost," a close Rafsanjani aide, who asked not to be identified, told Reuters.

Now, what happens just before the predictable election results come in:

Fri Jun 24,11:19 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush will deliver a major address to U.S. troops and the nation about Iraq on Tuesday night from the U.S. military base at Fort Bragg, NorthCarolina, the White House said.

"This is a critical moment in Iraq," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said on Friday in announcing the speech. "This is a real time of testing."

McClellan said the speech would be delivered at 8 p.m., and that the White House has asked U.S. television networks to air the address live.

Bush is expected to use the prime time speech to outline his strategy in Iraq amid increasing public doubts about the war.


The Unocal analysis shows you that every act of China is cast with the intent that regardless of the outcome China improves its position. The Iranian election analysis shows you that what the NWO wants is not always apparent from what it says it wants. The fact that Bush is going to speak live from a military base announced hours before the election results asking live television coverage when we all know he has little to say positive about Iraq means that he is setting the stage to probably defend an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites, the probability being near 100% that Israel will justify a strike on such sites now based on the Ahmadinejad win and the record of his statements anti-West and anti-Israel.

So, China pursues Unocal with its own agenda and Bush adds big bucks to the ante by pursuing Iran. Bush says his strategy will assure that China proves itself the paper tiger and Bush will have Iran and once having Iran he will explain that it abates most of all opposition in Iraq, thus proving important for US troops and US interests. Bush will further explain that Syria once Iran "loses it nuclear threat capability" will also prove of no consequence to US troops and interests in Iraq. Of course reinterpreted it means the NWO will move for control of oil in both Iraq and Iran and neutralize Syria which will mean Bush will complete his mission as per

What are the chances of this unfolding on Tuesday: 50%, which is very high for such an extreme war scenario. It means Israel must attack, Israel must be somehow injured to allow US troops in Iraq to move in Iran to protect Israel. It also serves as an excuse for China not to intervene against US intervention for "injured" Israel.

A more important dynamic is what are the chances of the scenario (or something similar) unfolding in the foreseeable future? Answer: 80%. The NWO is arguing that the new Iranian leadership can only result in making the NWO position in Iraq totally untenable. Thus, the only conclusion per 9-11 is that it wanted Ahmadinejad to win because he was the sine qua non for the NWO to push through for the US and Israel the inevitable need to quash the nuclear sites and in doing so open the portal for US troops to enter Iran. This of course suggests some plan to effectuate a successful response/counterattack on Israel.

Thus, while one could argue that the market slid 300 points in two days because it was anticipating the Ahmadinejad victory, the real reason for the slide is that it portends the attack on Iran.

What will we say if an attack soon launches against Iranian nuclear sites by Israel? Not that we were on target about the launch and the true reasons therefor but that we were on target that we have entered the very dark period we have been fearing and that truly dangerous times will thereafter unfold for all of us.

The White House knows that Tuesday's address is intended to historical. What can I say that I hope that this E-mail helps act against it proving historical. They really believe China will not have any response and that they will get away with it as explained in previous E-mails playing the game from where they sit to see themselves occupying both Iraq and Iran. Similar to a previous time, if you see Bush smiling that he got away with it, he and the NWO are discounting the then forthcoming response from China and others strongly opposed from NWO control of Iraq and Iranian oil and the evil mindset that pushed through the occupation and control. Israel thinking that it played its cards correctly, getting the NWO to now support it rather than shift to the Arab/Islamic block, will find out it made for sure the biggest mistake in its entire history.

This leads to one other important point in this very serious analysis...

The most difficult question I was recently asked is how do I think the NWO will respond to China's taking over the dominant global leadership role. Since the NWO will not allow it, how will the NWO offset China?

Read the following very slowly and carefully please...

Preparing for the Next Pandemic
by Michael T. Osterholm
May 25, 2005

Excerpt from the forthcoming essay in the July/August issue

Michael T. Osterholm is Director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, Associate Director of the Department of Homeland Security's National Center for Food Protection and Defense, and Professor at the University of Minnesota's School of Public Health.

What should the industrialized world be doing to prepare for the next pandemic? The simple answer: far more. So far, the World Health Organization and several countries have finalized or drafted useful but overly general plans. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has increased research on influenza-vaccine production and availability. These efforts are commendable, but what is needed is a detailed operational blueprint for how to get a population through one to three years of a pandemic. Such a plan must involve all the key components of society. In the private sector, the plan must coordinate the responses of the medical community, medical suppliers, food providers, and the transportation system. In the government sector, the plan should take into account officials from public health, law enforcement, and emergency management at the international, federal, state, and local levels.

At the same time, it must be acknowledged that such master blueprints may have their drawbacks, too. Berkeley's Aaron Wildavsky persuasively argued that resilience is the real key to crisis management-overly rigid plans can do more harm than good. Still, planning is enormously useful. It gives government officials, private-sector partners, and the community the opportunity to meet, think through potential dilemmas, purchase necessary equipment, and set up organizational structures for a 12- to 36-month response. A blueprint forces leaders to rehearse their response to a crisis, preparing emotionally and intellectually so that when disaster strikes the community can face it.

Influenza-vaccine production deserves special attention. An initiative to provide vaccine for the entire world must be developed, with a well-defined schedule to ensure progress. It is laudable that countries such as the United States and Vietnam are pursuing programs with long-term goals to develop and produce H5N1 vaccine for their respective populations. But if the rest of the world lacks supplies, even the vaccinated will be devastated when the global economy comes to an abrupt halt. Pandemic-influenza preparedness is by nature an international issue. No one can truly be isolated from a pandemic.

The pandemic-related collapse of worldwide trade and its ripple effect throughout industrialized and developing countries would represent the first real test of the resiliency of the modern global delivery system. Given the extent to which modern commerce relies on the precise and readily available international trade of goods and services, a shutdown of the global economic system would dramatically harm the world's ability to meet the surging demand for essential commodities such as food and medicine during a crisis. The business community can no longer afford to play a minor role in planning the response to a pandemic. For the world to have critical goods and services during a pandemic, industry heads must stockpile raw materials for production and preplan distribution and transportation support. Every company's senior managers need to be ready to respond rapidly to changes in the availability, production, distribution, and inventory management of their products. There is no model for how to revive the current global economy were it to be devastated.

To truly be complete, all planning on international, regional, national, and local levels must consider three different scenarios: What if the pandemic begins tonight? What if it starts one year from now? What if the world is so fortunate as to have an entire decade to prepare? All are possible, but none is certain.

Ehrlich: The NWO has taken Zemin's SARS agenda and turned it now against China by asserting that it would entertain a global pandemic that would undermine global trade for an extended period TO UNDERMINE CHINA AND ITS EMERGING GLOBAL LEADERSHIP ROLE POLITICALLY AND ECONOMICALLY.

Sorry but allowing these crazy people to get away with 9-11 allowed them to go on and now wage a 9-11 course against the country they help build up: China.

My point is that for these nuts the weapon of choice for the future is not nuclear but from where I sit custom designed microbes. Their problem is that if China takes a bunch of people into a room and sees that it kills off only Chinese or Asians and no other group then you have nuclear war. Moreover, from where I sit, any such designed microbe can mutate in any event and thus can kill off even the NWO who think they sit there immune from it either by design or having the antidote to it which they cannot disclose without taking responsibility for it. Thus for those NWO nuts with the antidote, I say that you will not have it for the mutated form of the microbe and I can tell you right now, the nuts that you are, that it is likely to mutate quickly in a real time environment as against the structured one tested for mutation qualities.

It's pretty pathetic. The goal as I long expressed is to have stopped them early on. Now, you can see that they are crazy and intend to not allow China to prevail as I always feared would be the case. Thus, I am left with begging Israel not to attack Iran, to reject the NWO, since their ultimate agenda is to eviscerate Israel from the nation it was intended to be (having done a darn good job already of it), and that by following the correct path Israel can get G-d to intervene for it is only He that can get rid of our true global pandemic: the NWO.

Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
June 26, 2005

A general outline of the elaborate plans to orchestrate world events at every level is contained in the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”. For those that have never heard of this or have not read it, I highly recommend that you take a look. This without a doubt proves that history as we know it is not a random happening of events. It is all leading somewhere. It is leading to a totalitarian world government. Things continue to go as planned. There are people who say that this is a hoax written by anti-semitic extremists. The way I see it, they are right. It was written by anti-Semitic extremists, the Zionists. However, it is not a hoax. Take a look at the contents of these writings and see how history has unfolded and see where it is headed. That should be all the proof you need. This is a very interesting commentary on this topic.

'Protocols Of Zion' -
A Non-Zionist
Jewish Perspective

Letter to the Editor
By Joseph Weinstein

(Because of the continuing interest in this subject, I would be interested in hearing comments...but please ONLY from people who have actually READ the entire book. I am well familiar with the hoax theories about their authorship and so forth. Please send comments to will be forwarded to me. --JW)

Dear Mr. Rense,

The 'controversy' about who wrote the Protocols continues. However, the obvious, practical conclusion is that it doesn't make any difference WHO wrote them. The argument about authorship and hoax theories are utterly MOOT. This 'controversy' is usually seated among people who have NOT read them.

Anyone I know who has actually read them has no doubt about them and what they represent. The Protocols, no matter who penned them, are the key to understanding the current collapse of our civilization.

The wholesale extermination of Moslems in Iraq and Afghanistan indicates to me in NO uncertain terms, that we are clearly at the beginning of WW3. The endless lies in the controlled media about 911 and Iraq war have forced me to, again, review the Protocols. The simple, blatant FACT is that a very small group of Zionist Jews have implemented virtually every one of Protocols. And all that has been done behind the backs and without the knowledge of 99% of we Jews.

I have just reread the Protocols once again (maybe for the tenth time):

And, as always, I remain amazed...absolutely AMAZED. Each time I reread it, I am discovering new implementations of the Protocols, and how the protocols are slowly confiscating our properties, eroding our economies and the civil rights of the populations in western countries, and the stupid Goyim STILL do not realise it.

To think that this very small Zionist group has succeeded over the last 50 years in replacing, controlling or seriously influencing most of the political, military and intelligence leadership of western countries, is mind-bogglingly awesome. This 'coup' predicated on the Protocols is, in my humble opinion, Mr. Rense, the most important news event of the last 100 years.

While this subject is discussed widely around the world - and a 30-part television series about the Protocols is running in many Moslem countries, we in the West are NOT allowed to ever mention this subject. Only now, I am beginning to understand why we Jews were always forbidden to read the Protocols. They were never discussed in our home. It is a very sad and dangerous situation when Moslems are better informed about Zionism than are we.

Only a person who is familiar with the Protocols can easily, correctly interpret the barrage of misleading/fabricated statements coming out of Downing street and the White House. NO ONE can claim to be informed about the current state of the world WITHOUT having read the Protocols.

Here are just a few random excerpts to ponder:

6. In a word, to sum up our system of keeping the governments of the goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrorist attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us, we shall respond with the guns of America or China or Japan.


6. The GOYIM enter the lodges out of curiosity or in the hope by their means to get a nibble at the public pie, and some of them in order to obtain a hearing before the public for their impracticable and groundless fantasies: they thirst for the emotion of success and applause, of which we are remarkably generous. And the reason why we give them this success is to make use of the nigh conceit of themselves to which it gives birth, for that insensibly disposes them to assimulate our suggestions without being on their guard against them in the fullness of their confidence that it is their own infallibility which is giving utterance to their own thoughts and that it is impossible for them to borrow those of others ....

You cannot imagine to what extent the wisest of the GOYIM can be brought to a state of unconscious naivete in the presence of this condition of high conceit of themselves, and at the same time how easy it is to take the heart out of them by the slightest ill-success, though it be nothing more than the stoppage of the applause they had, and to reduce them to a slavish submission for the sake of winning a renewal of success.... by so much as ours disregard success if only they can carry through their plans, by so much the Goyim are willing to sacrifice any plans only to have success.

This psychology of theirs materially facilitates for us the task of setting them in the required direction. These tigers in appearance have the souls of sheep and the wind blows freely through their heads. We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM .... They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality ....





15. Methods of organization like these, imperceptible to the public eye but absolutely sure, are the best calculated to succeed in bringing the attention and the confidence of the public to the side of our government. Thanks to such methods we shall be in a position as from time to time may be required, to excite or to tranquillize the public mind on political questions, to persuade or to confuse, printing now truth, now lies, facts or their contradictions, according as they may be well or ill received, always very cautiously feeling our ground before stepping upon it .... WE SHALL HAVE A SURE TRIUMPH OVER OUR OPPONENTS SINCE THEY WILL NOT HAVE AT THEIR DISPOSITION ORGANS OF THE PRESS IN WHICH THEY CAN GIVE FULL AND FINAL EXPRESSION TO THEIR VIEWS owing to the aforesaid methods of dealing with the press. We shall not even need to refute them except very superficially.


4. NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

1. We shall soon begin to establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of colossal riches, upon which even, large fortunes of the GOYIM will depend to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of the States on the day after the political smash ...

4. The aristocracy of the GOYIM as a political force, is dead -- We need not take it into account; but as landed proprietors they can still be harmful to us from the fact that they are self-sufficing in the resources upon which they live. It is essential therefore for us at whatever cost to deprive them of their land. This object will be best attained by increasing the burdens upon landed property -- in loading lands with debts. These measures will check land-holding and keep it in a state of humble and un-conditional submission.

7. To complete the ruin of the industry of the GOYIM we shall bring to the assistance of speculation the luxury which we have developed among the GOYIM, that greedy demand for luxury which is swallowing up everything.

2. Throughout all Europe, and by means of relations with Europe, in other continents also, we must create ferments, discords and hostility. Therein we gain a double advantage. In the first place we keep in check all countries, for they will know that we have the power whenever we like to create disorders or to restore order. All these countries are accustomed to see in us an indispensable force of coercion. In the second place, by our intrigues we shall tangle up all the threads which we have stretched into the cabinets of all States by means of the political, by economic treaties, or loan obligations. In order to succeed in this we must use great cunning and penetration during negotiations and agreements, but, as regards what is called the "official language," we shall keep to the opposite tactics and assume the mask of honesty and complacency. In this way the peoples and governments of the GOYIM, whom we have taught to look only at the outside whatever we present to their notice, will still continue to accept us as the benefactors and saviours of the human race.

3. We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.

4. Moreover, the art of directing masses and individuals by means of cleverly manipulated theory and verbitage, by regulations of life in common and all sorts of other quirks, in all which the GOYIM understand nothing, belongs likewise to the specialists of our administrative brain. Reared on analysis, observation, on delicacies of fine calculation, in this species of skill we have no rivals, any more than we have either in the drawing up of plans of political actions and solidarity. In this respect the Jesuits alone might have compared with us, but we have contrived to discredit them in the eyes of the unthinking mob as an overt organization, while we ourselves all the while have kept our secret organization in the shade. However, it is probably all the same to the world who is its sovereign lord, whether the head of Catholicism or our despot of the blood of Zion! But to us, the Chosen People, it is very far from being a matter of indifference.


4. The GOYIM are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock? ....

5. There is another reason also why they will close their eyes: for we shall keep promising them to give back all the liberties we have taken away as soon as we have quelled the enemies of peace and tamed all parties ....

6. It is not worth to say anything about how long a time they will be kept waiting for this return of their liberties .... _____

Pretty amazing, no? Again, I am interested in comments but ONLY from people who have actually and honestly read them and would care to comment on how world Zionism has implemented nearly all the Protocols - no matter who authored them. I thank you for hosting a forum upon which those of us, Jew and non-Jew, who care about this and other crucial matters can honestly discuss monumentally-important issues.


Joseph Weinstein

Here is a very profound quote from the movie: The Matrix. There is so much truth to this statement. We are being shown a window to the truth via blockbuster Hollywood films. Unfortunately, most regard this as mere dialogue written in the script of science fiction to make up the fantasy storyline which they will get their $9 admission’s worth of entertainment with. This is why the media arm of the NWO pulls this off. They know this is how people will react even though they are shown the clues.

Morpheus: The Matrix is everywhere.
It is all around us, even now in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, when you go to church, when you pay your taxes.
It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
If you were born in China, you'd most likely be a faithful Communist. If you were born to a traditional tribal family in Haiti, you'd be practicing Voodoo. Every society produces people who are passionately convinced that their beliefs are right, even to the extent that they are willing to die for it.
The majority of humans are products of society. Almost every religion claims that the other is wrong. One way or another at least one billion people are living in error. Maybe none of them have a monopoly on the truth, and everyone is wrong.
Wake up. Become intellectually independent of the society that formed your beliefs. Otherwise you're just a puppet of society. And society could be making some very grave errors...