Journal of the last days: 7/4/05

Here is more insight regarding the true motives of these explosions. Could this event be designed to usher in a national ID card? I’m sure we’ll find out more.

Explosions In London - Who Stands To Gain? Israel Warned, Cover-up In Progress
Propaganda Matrix | July 7 2005
BREAKING: Scrambled cover-up to try and change prior knowledge story.
Original reports stated that Binyamin Netanyahu was warned BEFORE the first blast, now all the Associated Press reports are being changed to say he was warned AFTER the first blast, for example this article.
The article linked below that we saved in our own format (and the website that carried it has strangely since crashed) said that Netanyahu was warned before the first blast.
Israel are now denying they got a warning.
BREAKING: Scotland Yard says it got a warning before the attack and told Israel.
"The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit."
Full article here.
The warning contradicts the fact that the original explanation of a power surge went out for an hour or more. They knew it was an attack but put out a false explanation. Plus why did Netanyahu get a warning and the victims didn't?
We have been told that the events unfolding today were "inevitable", London's transport network has been hit with multiple explosions. Both the Underground and Buses have been hit. Events are still unfolding.
We predicted this would happen over a year ago after analyzing the propaganda and fearmongering that was being ratcheted up to the extreme in London. Paul Joseph Watson has predicted these events as imminent several times on The Alex Jones Show in recent months.
Tony Blair is not in London but safely tucked up in Scotland with 7 other World Leaders including President Bush. The political eyes of the world are on Britain this week. The Mayor of London Ken Livingstone is in Singapore where the IOC has just awarded the Olympic Games to London, he is rushing back to the city.
Just like the events of 9/11, ask yourself, who stands to gain from this? Could this have been organized by any group other than one who has direct unlimited access to all areas of London's transport grid at all times?
The similarities with the Madrid bombing of 3/11/04, which we have persistently highlighted as an inside intelligence operation, are stark with bombs on separate trains set off within minutes of each other as the trains neared the stations. The so called perpetrators were quickly linked to an "Al Qaeda" cell in Europe but later as we reported were linked to the Spanish Security service. They then mysteriously Killed themselves as this information was seeping out. It then became apparent that Spain's government was using the bombings for its own gains and many went to the streets in Spain to declare they knew that their own government was behind the attacks. Further Intelligence was withheld by the government, we expect the same will happen in Britain after today's attacks.
This has MI5 written all over it. Just watch that national ID card legislation sail through. Only 15% of the country supported the government after the last election, this will ensure total fealty to a smarmy Blair and whatever he wants to do. Ken Livingstone and the opposition parties will now have no grounds to reject ID card legislation, especially with the Olympics coming to London in 2012.
The police state measures they'll get out of this will be overlaid onto all forms of transport. In fact, you won't be able to travel without the ID card. Although MI5 operations are normally more sophisticated than things like 9/11, in that the evidence linking it to the government is more carefully covered, just watch for the evidence of inside involvement to trickle out. MI5 have been caught involved in IRA bombings multiple times over.
Alex has said over and over that as attacks on different sections of the transportation grid occur they are going to have police state setup in the areas. Now it will be on the buses, subways etc.
FLASHBACK: Schumer Wants Airport Screening Technology in Malls

The military-industrial complex has the motive in this latest atrocity. Every major western government, including the British, has been caught red-handed carrying out bombings against their own people and blaming it on external enemies. It is mainstream news in Spain that the government was involved in the 3/11 bombing. The London 7/7 bombings are nothing different. Government ghouls are now all over television spreading the fear to encourage the people to submit to the war on terror. Support our work, spread the word, expose who is gaining power from terrorism, or our freedoms will be lost.
Hours after the attacks the media is still not providing extensive coverage. We would expect to see hundreds of eyewitness accounts and footage of the train stations. Independent London reporter Simon Aronowitz, who has a contact within the BBC, has reported that journalists are finding the coverage of the situation highly irregular. It seems that the information being released to the British public is being carefully stage managed.

It’s déjà vu. It looks like we’re going through the same thing all over again. After 9-11, evidence of the attack being a planned inside job started popping up all over the place. there were also warnings given on that day to certain people. The news media is telling us that this attack has the signature of Al Qaeda. It looks more like the signature of the NWO to me.

Stratfor Consulting Intelligence Agency: ’Israel Warned United Kingdom About Possible Attacks’
Bellacio | July 8 2005
Israel Warned United Kingdom About Possible Attacks Summary
There has been massive confusion over a denial made by the Israelis that the Scotland Yard had warned the Israeli Embassy in London of possible terrorist attacks “minutes before” the first bomb went off July 7. Israel warned London of the attacks a “couple of days ago,” but British authorities failed to respond accordingly to deter the attacks, according to an unconfirmed rumor circulating in intelligence circles. While Israel is keeping quiet for the time-being, British Prime Minister Tony Blair soon will be facing the heat for his failure to take action.
Analysis
The Associated Press reported July 7 that an anonymous source in the Israeli Foreign Ministry said Scotland Yard had warned the Israeli Embassy in London of possible terrorist attacks in the U.K. capital. The information reportedly was passed to the embassy minutes before the first bomb struck at 0851 London time. The Israeli Embassy promptly ordered Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to remain in his hotel on the morning of July 7. Netanyahu was scheduled to participate in an Israeli Investment Forum Conference at the Grand Eastern Hotel, located next to the Liverpool Street Tube station -- the first target in the series of bombings that hit London on July 7.
Several hours later, Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom officially denied reports that Scotland Yard passed any information to Israel regarding the bombings, and British police denied they had any advanced warning of the attacks. The British authorities similarly denied that any information exchange had occurred.
Contrary to original claims that Israel was warned “minutes before” the first attack, unconfirmed rumors in intelligence circles indicate that the Israeli government actually warned London of the attacks “a couple of days” previous. Israel has apparently given other warnings about possible attacks that turned out to be aborted operations. The British government did not want to disrupt the G-8 summit in Gleneagles, Scotland, or call off visits by foreign dignitaries to London, hoping this would be another false alarm.
The British government sat on this information for days and failed to respond. Though the Israeli government is playing along publicly, it may not stay quiet for long. This is sure to apply pressure on Blair very soon for his failure to deter this major terrorist attack.
For more breaking intelligence on this and other stories, please visit premium.stratfor.com.

The Satanic global elite are obsessed with numerology. Events are orchestrated to occur on specific occult numbered days. In recent times, it has happened with the Madrid train bombings, 9-11 and now this.

An Illuminati Ordered
'Terrorist' Attack In London
Commentary
By Michael Shore - Israel
7-7-5

Today is 7/ 7 2005 {2+5} or 777, a "perfect" day for the insane Illuminati to do one of their dirty deeds. One thing the Illuminati are into is rituals and numbers. The Illuminati like to leave their secret markings on their crimes. Remember 911?

Bush and Blair desperately needed some kind of new "terrorist" attack because they were losing the support of their citizens for the war in Iraq.The "Downing Street Memo" was a problem for both Bush and Blair and was not going away.
http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/

The G8 anti-poverty demonstrations were also a negative factor for these two men and the other six G 8 members. So what better way to divert the people's attention than to "order up" a "terrorist" bombing in the U.K.

All this may sound pretty unbelievable, but it's no different than the Illuminati engineered 911 killing "mass casualty producing event", but on a much smaller scale.

You have to watch the initial news reports which were purposely confusing. After all if you control all the news media, you can report just about anything you'd like to report for your benefit. From the news reports, it sounded like there weren't as many deaths as the Illuminati had expected. First there was a report of only two deaths, which is much less than this insane group of killers and gangsters had expected.
"U.S. law enforcement sources say the British government has said at least 40 people are dead in bomb attacks." On the same page you will notice "two confirmed dead". Plus what is "US law enforcement sources" { whatever that means} reporting so quickly on how many dead there are in London? Why wouldn't the London police report something like that themselves?

From the way the news of the bombings were reported, it sounded that possibly a few of their bombs did not go off as planned. There was a report that there were two buses that had blown up, when only one bus was confirmed and pictures were shown.

"12:35 Scotland Yard revises the number of blasts down to four, three in the underground system and one on a bus. These are: Russell Square and Kings Cross Underground, Moorgate, Aldgate and Liverpool Street Underground, Edgware Road station and Tavistock Square where there was an explosion on a bus."

Then you have the typical claiming of responsibility by some unknown bogus "terrorist" group called " the "Secret Organization group of al Qaeda Organization in Europe," who claimed responsibility in a Web site posting. The authenticity of the claim could not immediately be verified." People will not even remember the name of this bogus organization by tomorrow.
Plus it was not even claimed to be a "suicide" bombing, so any of the US or British "black ops" killer government groups could have easily planted their bombs on the trains and bus and remotely detonated them. Since it already has been established that this was a supposed "terrorist" attack, there will be no need for a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION to find out where the bomb parts came from and WHO made the bombs>>>CASE CLOSED, no more investigation needed here.YEAH RIGHT SURE! The People will never notice this one BIG major give away for the real "black ops" perpetrators of the killing act to get away "scott free" in so-called "terrorist" attacks. One need look no further than Israel to see this kind of Modus Operandi by government controlled "black ops" small groups of individuals. So called "suicide" bombings in Israel and elsewhere go un-investigated thoroughly like other crimes, if it is called a "suicide TERRORIST" bombing". People would never want to believe that their gangster leaders would kill their own citizens for the benefit of the "elite" super wealthy Illuminati "rulers" and their connected web of gangsters,killers and thieves. But one only has to look at 911 to see this possible TRUTH!

There were even reports that Scotland Yard knew about the attacks before they took place, which is very strange. How could Scotland Yard have such information and possibly know who, what, where, when the attacks would occur and then DO NOTHING to stop them or warn their British citizens? Obviously an investigation is warranted.

The Illuminati desired damage had been done. They got their "TERRORIST DID IT" headline in their corporate controlled news media, which scared the shit out of the British People, who will now call "for something to be done" Tony Blair is temporarily off the hook for the "Downing Street Memo". Bush can ride on this "terror" coat tails because Americans can relate to riding on buses and possibly being blown up too. FEAR is being used here big time. Support for the bogus "war on terror" will increase again unfortunately and these gangster killers can continue their sick insane war in Iraq and steal billions of taxpayer dollars from the multi-billion dollars of weapons sales and bogus multi-billions of dollars of contracts to rebuild Iraq.

Probably the most sickening thing of this whole killing event is to hear Tony Blair and Bush call this London killing act "BARBARIC", while the US military has 'shock and awed" with their deadly precision bombs; and had their military BARBARICALLY KILL OVER ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND innocent Iraqi children, women and men, and wound, maim and torture hundreds of thousands more in this unnecessary horrendous SICK "war for oil and profit" in Iraq!!! How can the Illuminati supported Bush and Blair get away with their BARBARIC ACTS of killing on such a grand scale and the People not see this hypocrisy???

STOP THE SICK INSANE ILLUMINATI GANGSTERS AND KILLERS NOW!

PEACE

Michael Shore

Deep down inside it seems that people are collectively expecting the other shoe to drop any day now. People don’t necessarily dwell on it or talk about it since it is not a particularly pleasant topic to think about, but it doesn’t mean it is being ignored. it’s in the back of our minds.

Americans cope with 'inevitability' of attack
Friday, July 8, 2005; Posted: 1:34 p.m. EDT (17:34 GMT)
NEW YORK (AP) -- Carl Frankel can't help feeling it's just a matter of time before this city, still deeply scarred from the 2001 terrorist attacks, will once again be in the crosshairs.
"Just knowing the inevitability of it, it feels depressing and worrisome," said the 61-year-old clothes pattern maker in Manhattan. "I think we are all frustrated that this situation is continuing -- now for four years -- and we don't know what to do about it."
Similar apprehension was expressed around the country in the aftermath of the London bombings, though few said they would alter their daily routines.
Reminders of the potential of terrorism were everywhere. Extra police officers and bomb-sniffing dogs were visible at train stations, bus depots and airports in many big cities.
At Boston's Park Street subway station, an announcement telling people to report suspicious activity played repeatedly over an intercom.
Two subway stations in a suburb of Washington, D.C., closed for about an hour after commuters reported suspicious packages -- later determined to be harmless. In San Francisco, the Bay Area Rapid Transit system closed bathrooms in all of its stations as a security precaution.
In New York, vehicles entering bridges, tunnels and airports were subject to random inspections. Guards watched over the city's water supply. Patrol boats escorted ferries to Staten Island.
Soldiers carrying rifles strolled train stations while thousands of police officers finishing their shifts were held over for extra duty. Police said that, until further notice, every subway train in the city would have at least one uniformed officer on board.
Dave Hoops, 47, a pension administrator from Long Island, said he was heartened by the extra security.
"I'm not scared. I'm not frightened," he said. "New York is New York. As you can see, there is plenty of protection."
Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and New York Gov. George Pataki all made it a point to ride mass transit Thursday to illustrate their faith in its safety.
Other commuters said they would continue to ride, too, despite fears about security.
"It makes you wonder about the security you have in our transportation system," Paul Stark, 42, of Kildeer, Illinois, said of the overseas attack as he rode a train to Chicago. "But at the same time you can't manage your life around events that you don't have control over."
William Orem, 39, an editor for a Boston publishing company, said he felt detached from the events in London -- a feeling he acknowledged he shouldn't have.
"I've got that strange suspended feeling that a lot of Americans have, that until it's going on (here), until someone starts blowing up my subway, it still feels like it's somewhere else in the world," he said.

A major terrorist attack hit the public transportation system in London one day after it won the bid to host the 2012 olympics. You know the finger will point to Al- Qaeda. Notice the occult number that is frequently used in disasters caused by the Satanic globalist system (33).This instills more fear, increases the hostility toward muslim extremists and their respective countries and takes us one notch closer to another attack on U.S. soil. These are the types of events that can be a catalyst to bigger disasters.

ATTACKS KILL AT LEAST 33

At least 33 people have been killed and 1,000 injured in a series of terror attacks on London.
The first blast hit a train leaving Liverpool Street Station between Moorgate and Aldgate East at 8.51am. Seven people are confirmed dead in that blast.
At 8.56am a blast occured on a train between King's Cross and Russell Square killing 21 people.
Five people were killed in a blast at Edgware Road Tube station. Three trains are believed to have been hit by this explosion at 9.17am.
At 9.47am a number 30 bus at Upper Woburn Place was hit by a fourth blast. Emergency services could not confirm the number of dead in this attack.
A previously unknown group calling itself "Secret Organisation al Qaeda in Europe" said it carried out the attacks as revenge for British "military massacres" in Iraq and Afghanistan.
London hospitals have reported a total of 300 wounded after a series of blasts hit locations across the city on buses and Tube stations.
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair said there was evidence of explosives at least two sites.
Scotland Yard has denied reports they were warned of an attack by Israel minutes before the blasts.
Prime Minister Tony Blair, issued a joint statement from all the leaders at the G8 summit.
"This is not an attack on one nation - it's an attack on all nations and civilised people everywhere," he said.
"It's important however that those engaged in terrorism realise that our determination to defend our values and way of life is greater than their determination to cause death and destruction to innocent people."

Sure, the new movie which involves an alien attack is entertainment. I’m sure the effects will be top notch and the storyline will be somewhat decent. However, is that all that these types of movies are designed to do? A lot of these movies share a common plot. The unification of the global human spirit in response to an outside threat. Could this be a glimpse of what’s to come?

Return of the Alien Invaders
Tales of a Nation Under Attack by Alien Invaders Multiply at Theaters and on TV; Is There Deeper Meaning?
By STEPHEN HUMPHRIES
Steven Spielberg's "War of the Worlds" is acutely attuned to the zeitgeist of post-9/11 America.
In this adaptation of the H.G. Wells novel, Earth is still the most desirable piece of real estate in the Milky Way, the envy of the galactic neighborhood. But this retelling of the alien-invasion story, set in modern-day New Jersey rather than Wells' Edwardian London, tacitly acknowledges American fears of an attack on U.S. cities. A principal aspect of the film is the way a nation unites after an assault from a foreign invader.
The idea of extraterrestrials bent on mankind's destruction has been a popular sci-fi theme for more than a century. At different times, the stories have been interpreted as metaphors for different fears, including attacks by Nazis and Soviets. In the homeland-security era, however, "War of the Worlds" and several coming TV dramas about alien invasion tap into American worries about domestic terrorism.
"Usually you see an uptick in science fiction and horror films when there's a lot of global anxiety," says Brannon Braga, executive producer of "Threshold," a CBS series, due out this fall, about alien infiltration. "It's understandable that we would rather see these very agonizing and complex issues depicted in a metaphorical, escapist format."
Two other TV shows slated for fall explore external threats to mankind. "Invasion," on ABC, is about a Florida town battling what seems to be a stealthy alien takeover in the aftermath of a hurricane. NBC's "Fathom" centers on undersea creatures whose harmless appearance may be deceptive. Each may lead viewers to draw parallels between extraterrestrials and hidden terrorist cells.
Only "Chicken Little," a Disney feature that adds flying saucers to the "sky is falling" plot, offers a lighthearted take on the invasion theme.

New Context
Movies about UFO attacks have taken on a new meaning in today's context. Just nine years ago, "Independence Day" depicted destruction of New York skyscrapers in an almost gleeful, "there goes the neighborhood" fashion. By contrast, "War of the Worlds" purposefully avoids shots of Big Apple landmarks being destroyed -- images that now hit too close to home.
"What really struck me when I saw the finished film for the first time was how acutely you feel the loss of human life when it happens," says David Koepp, screenwriter of "War of the Worlds." "That's a post-9/11 adjustment that I don't think Steven [Spielberg] made consciously. It's just that he lives here, too, and that's how our thoughts about war and death are much, much different than they were 10 years ago."
Written in 1898, Wells's "War of the Worlds" has lent itself to various interpretations over time. Some critics believe that Wells wrote of worldwide fear of British invasion at the height of the colonial era. Others theorize that the work resonated with British readers because they believed Wells's Martian invaders symbolized the perceived threat of Kaiser Wilhelm.
Forty years later, Orson Welles adapted the work for a radio dramatization that cannily played upon public jitters of a looming second world war. Welles's broadcast made the fictitious events seem so real that hysterical listeners looked to the skies, believing that rocket cylinders had landed from Mars.
Communist Menace
A red scare of a different sort informed the 1953 "War of the Worlds" movie. In this version, stingray-shaped alien ships equipped with ray guns vaporized targets by making them glow like a light bulb during a power surge -- an image reminiscent of an atomic bomb.
"The notion of technology run amok and becoming antihuman, regardless of whether you were on the winning side or losing side, was pretty real for people," says Kevin Hagopian, lecturer in media studies at Pennsylvania State University.
Other sci-fi movies of the time -- "The Invasion of the Body Snatchers," "It Came from Outer Space," and "The Day the Earth Stood Still" -- have been interpreted as cold-war allegories set to eerie soundtracks of woozy theremins. The genre spoke to audience fears in ways their makers didn't necessarily intend, he surmises.
As the cold war thawed, Hollywood's aliens became more benign. In "2010" and "The Abyss," close encounters of the cosmic kind foster peace among nations.
"Those movies couldn't have been made in the '50s and '60s. In effect, the nonthreatening aspects of those films suggest that something's changing in the political climate," says Kevin Gilbert, who teaches "International Relations on Film -- the Human Face of Conflict" at the University of Denver.
For Spielberg, his friendly aliens of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" and "E.T." reflected the optimism of the time. "There's an innocence to a film like 'E.T.' that you couldn't get away with today," he told Entertainment Weekly.
Ultimately, the 2005 "War of the Worlds" reflects hope by depicting the sort of sacrifice and unity that came out of 9/11.
ABC's "Invasion" also aims to show that traumatic events can heal divided families and communities.
"There's an 'us versus them' mentality that you don't even need to leave our shores to feel," says creator Shaun Cassidy. "If that's allegorical for the state of our world, then good."

The globalists want a watered down U.S. military. The current strength of the military is too dominant for it to integrate into a new world order. How better to weaken the power of the U.S. than by getting it involved in a multi-fronted war? There is no way a country can survive multiple wars simultaneously. The international distaste for this country is already growing. This is not going to help it’s image.

Pentagon Wants US Ready
For 2 Wars At Same Time
Aljazeera.com
7-6-5

The Pentagon is considering a change in its military strategy that requires U.S. soldiers to be ready to fight two major wars at the same time, The New York Times reported.

The newspaper said that the changes are aimed at freeing more resources for the defense of U.S. territory and the fight against terrorism.

In their Qadrennial Defense Review mandated by Congress, top military officials are concerned that the concentration of U.S. forces in Afghanistan and Iraq is limiting the army's ability to deal with other potential armed conflicts, The Times said.

"The two-war model provides enough people and weapons to mount a major campaign, like the Persian Gulf war of 1991 or the invasion of Iraq in 2003, while maintaining enough reserves to respond in a similar manner elsewhere," the daily said.

The Pentagon is now questioning the concept of the two-war strategy, the daily said, adding that a prolonged military commitment, like the one in Iraq, can prevent the military from engaging in a full-scale campaigns elsewhere.

After years of claiming that U.S. forces were sufficient for a two-war strategy, "We've come to the realization that we're not," an unidentified Defense Department official was quoted as saying. "It's coming to grips with reality."

The two-war strategy requires more high-technology weapons, in particular warplanes, The Times said.

But it added that a focus on one war and counterterrorism efforts would require lighter, more agile forces, perhaps fewer soldiers, but more Special Operations units and a range of other requirements, such as intelligence, language and communications specialists.

The Defense Review, due to be presented to Congress by next year, is "an effort to create a construct that will bring a better balance" among domestic Defense, the antiterrorism campaign and conventional military requirements, the officials told the daily.

Military officials are also considering in detail what would happen if the U.S. decided to attack China, North Korea or Iran.

"The war in Iraq requires a very large ground-force presence ... War with China or North Korea or Iran ... would require a much more capable Navy and Air Force," said Loren Thompson, an analyst at the Lexington Institute, a policy research center in Arlington, Virginia.

"What we need for conventional victory is different from what we need for fighting insurgents, and fighting insurgents has relatively little connection to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons. We can't afford it all," he added.

Here it is again. It sure looks like the discovery of the Ark is on schedule. I don’t think that it is a coincidence that the Israeli disengagement from the Gaza strip and the day that Vendyl Jones has tentatively set for the discovery is one day apart. For some reason the timing has been designed this way. We’ll soon find out.'

Pin camera ready to roll on Ark of Covenant discovery
by Judi McLeod, Canada Free Press.
Wednesday, June 29, 2005
Toronto-- Mark August 14, 2005 on your calendar as potentially momentous. It’s one day before Ariel Sharon’s planned removal of 8,000 settlers from the Gaza strip, a dramatic event no matter the outcome.
Providing even more drama of a coincidental kind is Dr. Vendyl Jones. With the kind of credentials that make him one of the world’s most renowned experts on Qumran and the Land of Israel, Jones last month announced on Israel National Radio that he hopes to reveal the long-hidden site of the Ark of the Covenant "by August 14."
Stirring human imagination down through the ages, the Ark of the Covenant is allegedly the acacia chest in which Moses placed the Ten Commandments.
Jones calls his project to reveal the site of the ark, "Project Petakh Tiquah", "Door or opening of Hope".
No single story could ever do justice to the amazing accomplishments of Vendyl Jones, who was the true-life inspiration for Indiana Jones of Raiders of the Lost Ark blockbuster movie fame.
The real heroes of life are not up on the silver screen, they’re out in the field conducting tireless missions, under funded, media mocked, but soldiering on. The true-life red-blooded version always dwarfs the movie version.
Dr. Vendyl Jones’ painstaking detective work pinpoints the long lost ark as being "hidden in a secret passage that runs 18 miles south of the Temple Mount into the Judean desert."
No Hollywood hype could provide the same level of anticipation.
Since 1972, Jones has conducted eight major excavations of Qumran, the area where the Dead Sea scrolls were discovered in 1947. The Shemen Afar Shimon, the Holy Annointing Oil from the Holy Temple, was found in April 1988 by Jones’ archeological team. With an investment of nearly $2 million, all of it donated by supporters of his Vendyl Jones Research Institute and none of it from government, foundations and grants, Jones’ digs involve over 300 dedicated volunteers.
Should Vendyl Jones find what he is looking for in the Judean desert, Indiana Jones, the flickering ghost of the screen will be replaced by truth-is- stranger-than-fiction immortality.
By Aug. 14, Jones and Company are going to drill a borehole into the chamber which they believe contains the ark, drop a pin-camera in and, hopefully reveal the find to a watching world.
Non-believers may be interested to know that Jones has already discovered some of the holy items associated with the ark.
A credible Torah teacher, who hails from Texas, Jones has represented the Israeli Foreign Minister in a two-year lecture series on college campuses with P.L.O. representatives.
Rabbi Adin Israel Steinsalz, head of the Institute for Talmudic research and thought to be the world’s most renowned Talmudic scholar called Jones’ work, "Scientifically valid research which may result in important findings for the Jewish people and the world."
Wherever you plan to be on or around Aug. 14, you could be front row center to the filmed discovery of one of the world’s greatest artifacts of all time.
Missing for centuries, the ark is believed to have disappeared with the destruction of the First Temple by King Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon in 587 B.C. Indeed, the exact whereabouts of the ark have been shrouded in mystery ever since.
Incredibly the Ark of the Covenant has a pretender.
With the blessings of the United Nations, a bizarre ark knock-off, carried through Vermont farm fields and sailed by sloop to UN Manhattan headquarters, has been making the rounds as a show-and-tell exercise at public schools. Called the Ark of Hope, the replica carries, among other things, the Earth Charter, a replacement for the Ten Commandments as advocated by former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev and Kofi Annan right hand man, Maurice Strong.
The Earth Charter is "an international peoples’ treaty for building a just, sustainable and peaceful global society in the 21st century". (Philologos Bible Prophecy Research).
Even as you read this, the hidden location of the real artifact is underway with results possibly coming your way the summer of 2005.

Journal of the last days

Tuesday, July 05, 2005

7/4/05 - 7/10/05

0 Comments:

First time visitors

Resources/Links

Documents

Audio Archives Links

Previous Posts

Archives